homer
Forum elite
Posts: 686
|
Post by homer on Jun 25, 2012 4:10:32 GMT 2
Almost forgot if the formations are same please have it so when I click forward more than 1 myth foot my units don't decide to switch places.
|
|
|
|
Post by bullseye on Jun 25, 2012 8:42:13 GMT 2
Kith-Kanan? Ancrik? #mythordersfrom1997
|
|
par73
Forum legend
Posts: 935
|
Post by par73 on Jun 25, 2012 8:51:20 GMT 2
funny part is I almost messaged senor budd today "HEY WANT TO PLAY IN FFA TOURNAMENT?" but i already knew the response  |
|
|
|
Post by bullseye on Jun 25, 2012 9:03:40 GMT 2
sorry, was out hiking
|
|
|
|
Post by adrenaline on Jun 25, 2012 20:40:09 GMT 2
Almost forgot if the formations are same please have it so when I click forward more than 1 myth foot my units don't decide to switch places. jesus *cruiser* yes... this is so damn annoying. or setting bows (for example to staggered line... why in hell don't they move into formation in a logical sequence... like... to the position closest to them. so often i find the one *cruisering* bowman walking from one end to the other to form up. |
|
|
|
Post by headhunter on Jun 25, 2012 22:30:29 GMT 2
also agreeing on the formation issue - the ability to customize a formation or multiple formations would be amazing - create your own!-.
|
|
amino1
A better forum warrior
Posts: 117
|
Post by amino1 on Jun 26, 2012 1:41:38 GMT 2
Yeah, pathfinding could be improved somewhat, but it's pretty good for what it is. I absolutely think perma-stained battlefields and interactive detritus is a huge boon. Also, individual unit names (that are modifiable) can, in single player at least, turn an otherwise ordinary unit into a faithful veteran with the potential to see you through the whole campaign--a nice touch of personalization.
|
|
|
|
Post by kithkanan on Jun 26, 2012 4:58:48 GMT 2
Wow, that's a lot of responses! Thanks for all the feedback so far, guys!
Obviously, I know the things that I love about it, but this is shining a light on elements that I might not have considered.
Someone mentioned the idea of acquiring the rights to the actual Myth series. I have looked into it some, and heard from others who have looked into it a lot more than I have, and I am confident that there is no way that Take 2 will accept any terms that Rubicite could dream of being able to afford. I am still reaching out to them to talk about licensing the Myth engine, but I don't have much hope of that actually happening either.
To those of you who have volunteered to help in some way, Rubicite is a small company. I appreciate the offers, and once we are further along on this project, I will definitely be in touch. Good help like the Myth community can provide will certainly be welcome, and will go a long way toward getting the project done more quickly.
|
|
pogue
Forum elite
Posts: 642
|
Post by pogue on Jun 26, 2012 5:51:22 GMT 2
Just a heads up, don't give any money to renwood.
|
|
homer
Forum elite
Posts: 686
|
Post by homer on Jun 26, 2012 8:14:43 GMT 2
lol
|
|
|
|
Post by grim on Jun 26, 2012 9:21:12 GMT 2
Someone mentioned the idea of acquiring the rights to the actual Myth series. I have looked into it some, and heard from others who have looked into it a lot more than I have, and I am confident that there is no way that Take 2 will accept any terms that Rubicite could dream of being able to afford. I am still reaching out to them to talk about licensing the Myth engine, but I don't have much hope of that actually happening either. Well, that's kinda why I mentioned that you shouldn't give up on trying to pursue the rights. I saw your thread on the magma forums and like I said, the people there are the source of the ambiguous information regarding Take 2's requests for the rights. They are also rather reluctant on trying to contact them again, so I wouldn't stop trying based on the info you get from them, if I were you. |
|
|
|
Post by vihaan on Jun 26, 2012 9:50:20 GMT 2
Also it would be nice if archers could fire their arrows parallel to themselves instead of all converging on one point; right now (i think) we have to individually select each archer to make them fire to different points
|
|
|
|
Post by Aki on Jun 26, 2012 10:11:29 GMT 2
Also it would be nice if archers could fire their arrows parallel to themselves instead of all converging on one point; right now (i think) we have to individually select each archer to make them fire to different points renwood's m4 plugin had a feature like that i think; similar to zooking in ww2 |
|
|
|
Post by vihaan on Jun 26, 2012 11:51:04 GMT 2
also if we had the option to reconnect if we disconnected
|
|
|
|
Post by waywardone on Jun 26, 2012 14:14:56 GMT 2
We are your beta testers, of course. Well, some of us.
|
|
