monty
Triple thrall
Posts: 36
|
Post by monty on Aug 17, 2012 16:52:27 GMT 2
1. Jimmy McMillan
2. Gary Johnson
3. Ron Paul
4. Mitt Romney (71%)
5. Obama (59%)
|
|
|
|
Post by eastwind on Aug 17, 2012 17:18:45 GMT 2
Gary Johnson 90%
Jill Stein 88%
Jimmy McMillan 82%
Obama 76%
Ron Paul 71%
|
|
|
|
Post by grim on Aug 17, 2012 18:51:32 GMT 2
Erm, what kind of questions are these?
"Is Global Warming a threat to the environment?"
Like, what the *cruiser*?
"Do you believe the theory of Evolution?"
What the shitfuck? It's not exactly a matter of faith. Why don't they ask if you believe in gravity or not.
1) Jill Stein 93
2) Obama 89
3) Steward Alexander 64
4) Mitt Romney 34
5) Ron Paul 2
Bush 04
Shinco
|
|
monty
Triple thrall
Posts: 36
|
Post by monty on Aug 17, 2012 19:11:39 GMT 2
sad but truethings you take as fact are constantly questioned and used to sway "educated" voters in this fine country |
|
par73
Forum legend
Posts: 935
|
Post by par73 on Aug 17, 2012 19:38:56 GMT 2
www.isidewith.com/results/4891939590% Jill Stein on science, economic, social, foreign policy, environmental, and domestic policy issues 77% Barack Obama on science, social, and foreign policy issues 71% Jimmy McMillan on immigration, domestic policy, healthcare, and foreign policy issues
|
|
|
|
Post by eastwind on Aug 17, 2012 21:48:45 GMT 2
I'm sure half your country doesn't think Obama is a muslim terrorist either g.
|
|
|
|
Post by guest on Aug 17, 2012 23:01:23 GMT 2
Erm, what kind of questions are these? "Is Global Warming a threat to the environment?" Like, what the *cruiser*? "Do you believe the theory of Evolution?" What the shitfuck? It's not exactly a matter of faith. Why don't they ask if you believe in gravity or not. 1) Jill Stein 93 2) Obama 89 3) Steward Alexander 64 4) Mitt Romney 34 5) Ron Paul 2 Bush 04 Shinco USA could kick Nordic countries ass. Respect our superiority. How about we send some nukes up your butt grim? Will you like us when you're dead, grim? - Cu Seinfeld |
|
|
|
Post by honkey on Aug 18, 2012 0:57:21 GMT 2
I dont think creationism should be taught in schools because there is no factual basis behind it. However..... you still gotta figure out where all the infinite space came from, and all the matter and material for the "big bang came from". You cannot ever rule out creationism until science is completely solved and every single thing in the universe can be explained. Evolution disproves christianity, islam, etc. However it does not prove anything about the universe in itself.
|
|
|
|
Post by asmo on Aug 18, 2012 1:05:05 GMT 2
Evolution disproves christianity, islam, etc. However it does not prove anything about the universe in itself. You need to get outside of your little box Honkey, you do realize that there are several christians who believe in evolution...You should read/study a lot more before you make bold claims like that. |
|
|
|
Post by honkey on Aug 18, 2012 1:06:34 GMT 2
My point is that evolution has a much stronger case against christianity, but doesnt apply against the little we know about space. For all we know this world was conceived by people like those immortal dudes in the green lantern (that movie sucked).
|
|
|
|
Post by Aki on Aug 18, 2012 1:16:51 GMT 2
The universe certainly wasn't created, by definition.
|
|
|
|
Post by grim on Aug 18, 2012 8:13:11 GMT 2
I dont think creationism should be taught in schools because there is no factual basis behind it. However..... you still gotta figure out where all the infinite space came from, and all the matter and material for the "big bang came from". You cannot ever rule out creationism until science is completely solved and every single thing in the universe can be explained. Evolution disproves christianity, islam, etc. However it does not prove anything about the universe in itself. Rather turn this around and say "You shouldn't teach creationism at schools until they actually start proving anything they say." Saying that science as a whole should just start systematically disproving every ludicrous ideology out there before taken as a fact (and those ideologies considered ludicrous) is just silly. |
|
|
|
Post by guest on Aug 18, 2012 14:30:17 GMT 2
g: your european logic has NO PLACE in American politics.
How do you like being POOR and SOCIALIST in your third world country? (Irony intended)
|
|
amino1
A better forum warrior
Posts: 117
|
Post by amino1 on Aug 18, 2012 14:45:40 GMT 2
I rather thought he was onto something with his whole "an answer's only as good as the question" angle.
|
|
|
|
Post by honkey on Aug 18, 2012 16:26:21 GMT 2
my whole point is that science will eventually lead us to something that we are incapable of understanding.
For instance: Scientists will say planets like saturn are ininhabilitable. My response to that is : for humans yes... but how do we not know their are forms of life out there that would thrive in that environment. Human scope of understanding is so limited, our size is so limited, and there will be no way to ever scientifically prove where the universe came from, or whether or not their is some type of supreme being (5th element), God, etc. There is no way we will ever be able to search the entire universe looking for these answers.
|
|
