|
|
Post by flatline on Jul 31, 2012 8:47:26 GMT 2
heheehaha been saying this shit for many years now. I still think this shit just kinda died right after mwc2k1 (the last of the great tourneys). With the closing of bnet and the move to pmnet and no mwc2002 at all etc etc etc. Big fish in an ever decreasing small pond now for a long time. Eventually all but 5 of us will come and watch the mwc's as a spectator sport like tb,seeker,shinco,cu do. lmao, 'last of the great tournies', well your obvious troll ploy (coz it can't be anything other than that) still leaves you in second place by trusting a retard with captaining your team to victory, who still has not seen victory in the tournament after it has survived 10 years past that initial year. how about it flat. There were like 8 teams or something enter this year (lol) with like 3 that had any chance at all of winning. Far cry from 99-2000-2001. |
|
|
|
Post by flatline on Jul 31, 2012 11:42:38 GMT 2
I have no idea who "chef" is also  |
|
|
|
Post by tirri on Jul 31, 2012 13:13:28 GMT 2
ahh yes according to the alleged 'greatest (FFA) myther ever' it is shameful to enjoy a game you are playing, but hate the fact you are addicted to still playing it. wait, what? i pressed ctrl+f but couldnt find shameful anywhere. i guess you are using some clever dictionary. before our first match gkg himself said that he sucks because he hasnt played much and guess what, his team got swept. after that gkg played roughly 50 games in one a day and hundreds of games in few weeks and managed to win. thats really great. just keep in mind that there hasnt been a single good myth player willing to match even one fourth of that effort in several years so what have we learned? when the playing field is, using gkgs words, roughly level, gkg gets swept. when gkg plays 10 times more than the competition, he wins. Woah, he must be really special and a masterful strategist |
|
|
|
Post by giantkillergeneral on Jul 31, 2012 14:32:17 GMT 2
Yea you already brought this up, the same as you do every year. It is really kind of you to notice though.
what is really funny about you bringing that up is: 1) i play diablo 3 which is the best way to get horrible at myth since it is a completely different and mindless game. Pretty much worse than not playing myth at all as I had to untrain myself from that game. 2) the vast majority of games I play are either a) me making strats for my team (I am the captain remember?), b) quick 1v1s with people that probably take all of 3-5 minutes, or c) me just watching games while I eat / chat / or go afk to go do other stuff.
But I guess the number of games I play/strat in/go afk in/watch makes me better at getting trades and strategies. Clearly your entire team has mastered every strategy there is in this game as it gets archers on zodiac fr. If only you guys had played more games though you would have known better. The logic is undeniable.
I should write a letter to Michael Jordan and tell him he wasn't shit because he spent too much time practicing to get good. Clearly the true greats in any competition are the ones that are good without even trying at all, even as they lose year after year. And clearly they don't care at all even as they cling to desperate excuses for losing year after year.
|
|
|
|
Post by giantkillergeneral on Jul 31, 2012 14:51:54 GMT 2
There were like 8 teams or something enter this year (lol) with like 3 that had any chance at all of winning. Far cry from 99-2000-2001. Ah yes flat, a far cry from that era indeed. In mwc2k1 which you might argue was the greatest, there was what? 80 teams? Well I placed 8th in that tournament and I was probably a 2-3 baller by today's standards at that time along with the rest of my team, and we sure as hell were a far cry from being finalist contenders. So are you to suggest to me that the 7 teams above us were all contenders for the finals? In mwc07 and 08 I was on raz's team and we placed 4th I think both years, and we sure as *cruiser* weren't on level with the 3 teams above us to contend for the finals. No, the fact of the matter is that every mwc has always had 3-5 teams with realistic potential for the finals, regardless of the number of players/teams playing in it. The vast amount of rabble teams which are your deer's and gru's of the myth world have been vastly reduced over the years, as they only played the game for 1-2 years, never got good, and then didn't care enough to make the transition to pmnet. The last remaining top players that continue to stay with the game still reform themselves fairly similarly in those top 3-4 teams year after year. You are just delusional enough to believe that the more gru and deer teams we enter into the tournament, the more competitive it naturally becomes. |
|
|
|
Post by eastwind on Jul 31, 2012 14:55:28 GMT 2
jeeus where's grim when you need him for a bombay Dear Tirri, It's clear not one *cruiser* was given by you. Why are you still checking this forum though? -Sincerely, SP |
|
|
|
Post by grim on Jul 31, 2012 15:03:34 GMT 2
I have no idea who "chef" is also One of Paris' several forum identities. |
|
|
|
Post by tirri on Jul 31, 2012 15:24:44 GMT 2
But I guess the number of games I play/strat in/go afk in/watch makes me better at getting trades and strategies. Clearly your entire team has mastered every strategy there is in this game as it gets archers on zodiac fr. If only you guys had played more games though you would have known better. The logic is undeniable. ummm, of course actually playing the map leads to making better strategies. i think i have played that map twice in my whole life and have never thought about strats for it. this is why i had no opinion on the tradel. your comment makes no sense. I should write a letter to Michael Jordan and tell him he wasn't shit because he spent too much time practicing to get good. Clearly the true greats in any competition are the ones that are good without even trying at all, even as they lose year after year. And clearly they don't care at all even as they cling to desperate excuses for losing year after year. nice analogy buddy. see the difference is that im almost sure there were at least 10 other people in the nba practising and trying hard while jordan was playing obviously i care a great deal. just not enough to actually play the game |
|
|
|
Post by giantkillergeneral on Jul 31, 2012 15:57:39 GMT 2
ummm, of course actually playing the map leads to making better strategies. i think i have played that map twice in my whole life and have never thought about strats for it. this is why i had no opinion on the tradel. your comment makes no sense. Umm, yea I said I played some myth games, not mwc map/games. I never played any of the mwc map/games prior to matches either. As if there is enough activity on myth during the finals matches to see big 2 team games hosted with mwc map/games. Everyone else is eliminated already, remember? When I looked at zodiac it took me all of 10 seconds to see what the trade/strategy had to be, which should have been very straight forward for anyone who knew what the hell they were doing. It was one of the easiest map/games to strat for. Thanks for proving my point as clear as ever. |
|
|
|
Post by tirri on Jul 31, 2012 16:08:15 GMT 2
youd have a great argument too if you werent the one going over the maps with your team-mates online while my team did nothing of the sorts
LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by giantkillergeneral on Jul 31, 2012 16:09:03 GMT 2
yes our 30 minutes spent going over maps before a 4 hour match! OMGOSH LOL.
you sound more like godcops on the forums with each passing year tirri
|
|
pogue
Forum elite
Posts: 642
|
Post by pogue on Jul 31, 2012 16:48:00 GMT 2
|
|
|
|
Post by tirri on Jul 31, 2012 16:48:23 GMT 2
i had actually forgotten that you went through the maps with your whole team, which makes a huge difference. i was actually talking about the several times that you were online going through the maps with a couple of your team-mates prior to sunday.
but plz keep on insisting like stratting would have made no difference while you did it way way more than my team
|
|
|
|
Post by chef on Jul 31, 2012 17:26:51 GMT 2
ummm, of course actually playing the map leads to making better strategies. i think i have played that map twice in my whole life and have never thought about strats for it. this is why i had no opinion on the tradel. your comment makes no sense Tirri, back where I come from, It's not considered smart, To be dumb. |
|
|
|
Post by chef on Jul 31, 2012 17:46:21 GMT 2
lmao, 'last of the great tournies', well your obvious troll ploy (coz it can't be anything other than that) still leaves you in second place by trusting a retard with captaining your team to victory, who still has not seen victory in the tournament after it has survived 10 years past that initial year. how about it flat. There were like 8 teams or something enter this year (lol) with like 3 that had any chance at all of winning. Far cry from 99-2000-2001. so the last real tourney was really 2000, since the original tournament champions played (and also won) for the last time in that year. 2001 is only included so you feel less butthurt even though you lost + you got wrecked by a team that a year ago probably could have won in 2000 as well. thus really any mwc tournament after 2000 is a far cry because more than one team had a chance at winning (see civil/SP) as far as im concerned most 'myth tournaments, ever' have been plagued with idiots behind the scenes and fools making entire mistakes costing their teams terrible matches. here has really never been one year of professionalism since civil and SF left the scene when this game went under. and no one counts mwc98 which was played on TFL to be involved as, mentioned or included as a great tourney, so we can drop that idea all together. |
|
